Script Wizard – Cool tool at a reasonable price

I recently received yet another ad email from the Writers’ Store (LINK). Don’t get me wrong … they have some cool stuff up there. But some of the software is beyond my budget while some of it seems beyond usefulness.

One offering that did catch my eye was Script Wizard. I had lost several hours of work using Celtx, the free script software (yes, even the recent 2.7 version), when it arbitrarily corrupted one of my script project files. I used it on my backup copy of the project file (stored on a second computer) and it corrupted that one, too. And I really wanted to finish this animated feature script I had been working on for a while. It seemed like Script Wizard would fit the bill. Not a stand-alone program, but a “plugin” (a.k.a. ‘template’) for MS Word, it still seemed a good fit for me. I like MS Word in general and Word 2007 in particular. I had used a couple of legacy Word script programs, which are basically macros. But they did not age well as I progressed through the versions of MS Office upgrade. And most of them did not have continuity of support from their source, be it a commercial company or some open source project.

So I decided to give Script Wizard a try. The entry fee, less than $70, was manageable. Add the 15% Writers’ Store discount code, and it essentially gave me “free” shipping and still saved me another buck or two.

The disk arrived in two days (which cost about 50 cents more than the basic shipping). The install was nearly instantaneous and completely painless. No stupid key codes, no weird disk read errors. The program features, based on my experience so far, all work as advertised. I don’t know about how well Script Wizard scripts work with import / export to higher end script programs like Final Draft, but it worked fine to import several different text format scripts I fed to it, including some exported as text out of Celtx and a couple I downloaded from some of the free script sites.

FYI, this is not a subsidized promotion, just a random user saying “Hey, here’s some stuff that works.”

Bottom line: this affordable software worked well with my existing writing tools (MS Word) and did what it claimed it could do. It supports older versions of MS Word, too.

Posted in Writing Tools | Leave a comment

Privishing – What Can Happen If Your Book Challenges the Powerful

A very interesting article from Dr. A. Nyland about what can happen if you write a book that the rich and powerful don’t like:  Gatekeepers and Privishing

Check it out.

Privishing is a new scary word now in my vocabulary.

This reminds me of a line from the movie ‘Broken Arrow’:

BAIRD: I don’t know what’s scarier — losing nuclear weapons or the fact that it happens so often that you people have a name for it.

Posted in Communication, Writing Biz | Leave a comment

Not on holiday …

I have been helping to “staff blog” over at Ann Wilkes’ “Science Fiction and Other Oddysseys” site the last few months.  Not lots new to say over here recently, but I will be back soon …

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Wordstock 10-10-09 – Best Yet

I got a chance to attend Wordstock this year, on Saturday. It is the premier book festival of the area, with lots to offer readers, writers, and lovers of things written.  My daughter Kyra, a young writer herself, joined me. Even the trip there was eventful. As we neared the Convention Center in downtown Portland, a Ukrainian evangelist boarded our Max train and used a plumb bob as a preaching prop to help bring us the word. I confess we left the train before we discovered the exact connection between the plumb bob and salvation.

We toured the booths, visiting the folks at the PSU MFA in Creative Writing program booth and the PSU Book Publishing program booth (the Ooligan Hooligans, I call them), among others. Lots of charming, sincere, thoughtful, sometimes intense people with great ideas and stories and experiences. And energy. Then several stops at the small publisher booths and a drive-by visit with Thomas Logan at The Grove Review booth, some fast noodles and pizza. And a visit to a couple of booths with people who had great messages and clearly not enough listeners. Some were like the little gray haired woman in the floral print dress at the end of aisle 9 in my neighborhood Thriftway grocery … all ready to dispence their tiny sausages on a toothpick, but with no takers. Yes, we did surrender to a couple of Mercy Testimonials … I couldn’t help myself.

Kyra and I made time to jot down a quick story at the “What Happened?” booth (we had both picked the same inspirationl picture among the four choices offered for the spontaenous writing contest based on the “What Happened?” theme of the festival).

Next we attended author readings from the likes of Steve Almond and Kristin Hersh, among others. Steve was hilarious and fun. His comedic timing was impressive. Several women in the audience expressed their willingness to bear his progeny, some over the P.A. during the Q&A period. Kristin was fun and a very compelling reader. What a reading voice she has! A musician-turned author who is still very much a musician … she’s an amazing powerhouse of emotion, insight, and spiritual depth in a tiny, ferocious frame. 

We also heard excerpts from Karl Marlantes’ Matterhorn. Karl oozed sincerity, in a totally good way. He reminded me of recently departed  Dennis Hopper, with some passing similarities in appearance, speech patterns,  and mannerisms.  Kyra suprised me by asking me to get her a copy of the book, a Viet Nam war novel … this from a teenager and avid reader of vampire fiction.

I bought her a copy of Karl’s book. I also bought another handful of books on characterization and plotting (yes, my name is D. and I am a plotting and characterization biblioholic).  And we snagged a handful of free books from the Multinomah County Library give-away pile.

We also caught a poetry reading from Suzanne Burns.   There is something very fresh and earnest and relentless about her work and her presentation style.

The highlight for Kyra and for me was Michele Glazer’s reading. To quote Kyra: “She looked into my soul.”  I think she looked into all of our souls.

After that reading, it seemed almost pointless to stay longer.  Yet we did, for just a little while.

Posted in Awesomeness, Writing As Art | Leave a comment

First post as staff blogger at SFOO

Out of the gate as new staff blogger for Science Fiction and Other ODDysseys … ( First Post Link )

Posted in Communication, Fearmongering, Technology | Leave a comment

Who is editing those e-pubs?

A discussion on one of the on-line critique groups I participate in has been rolling for some time in one form or another.  The subject: the quality of e-pubs.  In one of these discussions, writer Carol Kean, after recently reading several supposed professionally published e-pub books and finding error upon blatant error, asked the very pertinent question: Who is editing these things? 

It reminded me of an incident in my past which I shared with her and the group and am sharing with you now …

Some years ago I was asked to do a review of a new horror short story collection, said review to appear in a modest e-zine I edited at the time.  The request, from someone who identified himself as the president of a small press, had a pseudonym on the cover of the book.  This was clearly a thinly disguised self-published hardcopy … the “president” was also the author of the one and only book on this imprint, though he did not admit this to me at the time, or ever.  

I went through the first three stories of the book, found several errors in punctuation, grammar, even a missed word or two.  I went back to the author, make that the president of the small press, saying in effect, “Sorry, but I would rather NOT do a review of this book, since I’d feel obligated to do an honest review, which you might regard as being raked over the coals for all these errors.” I also mentioned that as for content, I saw problems with clichés, with coincidence or solution-from-the-sky endings, and with explicitly stated beat-the-reader-over-the-head moral object lessons.  I told him that I would rather say nothing than write a very unfavorable review about a new author.

He wrote me back insisting it was unlikely there were any errors in the book, nor flaws in his characterizations or plots, and he seriously doubted I had read even the first three stories.  He angrily demanded I return his copy of the book immediately, adding that the points he had made in his response to me were “not just a matter of my opion, they are fact”.  Yes, the “o-p-i-o-n” was his, too.  He then claimed he was a professional story editor and script doctor, so he “knows what he is talking about”.  He added that his editor was “positively irate” that I had made such a contention, further claiming she went back through the whole book and could not find any errors.  The author-president said that if I could prove her (his editor) wrong, he would recant the first portion of his response (the part denying there were any errors there).

 I went back to the title page of the book and found out that his “editor” slash typesetter had the same last name as he did … likely a wife, a sister, or his mum.  I concluded that editing a loved one’s manuscript should be on the order of removing a loved one’s appendix … something you should just not do for a loved one,  especially if you don’t have the training and experience for it.  At this point, I decided to go through the book from front to back: I found a couple dozen more errors in a full sweep of the book.  I forwarded the details with page and paragraph numbers and citations to him.  I got no response, ever, from the author-president, or his mum.

 I still have the hardcopy of his book, sitting on my shelf as a gentle reminder to never send any of my own work out before its time.  The author-editor’s book is still for sale on the web, nearly five years later.

He has since added another.  

What’s my point? While not all self-published works or e-pubs have this sort of Very Insolent Person behind them, the bubble of “sponsored” e-pubs is not necessarily much  different from all those completely self-published e-pubs and self-published hardcopies.  There are quite a few of us who are so eager to be read, to see our names on a publication that is, in theory, available to the masses, that we will take shortcuts, often unreasonable and quality compromising shortcuts, to get our stuff out there, to feel like we are “succeeding”. Some houses, publishing pros and semi-pros are doing their very best to screen this stuff, to ensure a higher standard for the output of their respective imprints.  I know some who are and I am guessing you probably do, too.  But many are not.  That reality is probably the best justification for us as writers to use groups like our on-line critique groups or local, in-person writers’ groups to sanity check our own quality levels.  It also means that when we critique we are assuming a fairly high level of responsibility to deliver substantive feedback, to not simply “sugar coat” our responses when delivering peer reviews.  We may well be the last editors some of these works ever see before they are launched into the Wild.

In the end, I expect the reading public is either going to become more intelligent and discerning in their own screening of such content sources or, more likely, they will make rather broad generalizations that will have a net negative impact on this publishing channel.  Regardless, we are probably all going to be judged by the company we keep.  This is perhaps the very best reason to take our own most excellent as-yet-unpublished masterpieces and make a real effort to find some other more traditional publishing channel … i.e. to NOT self-publish.

Though my thoughts on this have not changed much in the last five years, this is still just my opinion.  At some point, I might also get tired of sitting on and resubmitting all those unsold, unpublished short stories and novels and put mine out there, too.

Posted in Markets, Writing As Art, Writing Biz | 1 Comment

Ergo Explorations – What To Do When Your Wrists Won’t Write

A discussion came up in an on-line writing group regarding what to do about painful human-keyboard contact.  It would be inappropriate to recreate that thread here without the permission of all involved, but here’s a tweaked version of my own recommendations. 

If you have overcome all the mental and logistic blocks to getting your writing done, but have to face pain at the keyboard, problems with wrist fatigue, carpal tunnel syndrome, strange tinglings or outright pain in your digits, etc., I would strongly suggest a multi-pronged attack:

1 - Get a Medical Assessment

Make sure you don’t have an injury or illness that is causing the pain.  Pains in the extremities could indeed be carpal tunnel, or they could be something else.   If your problem is not related to injury or some form of repetitive stress, it could be from shingles, gout, or a vast array of other ailments, some of them hard for even the pros to diagnose.  Unless the source of the problem is completely obvious, get a qualified medical expert to assess your state of well-being in this regard.  If they have advice to offer and the advice is not completely ludicrous, try that advice before prescribing your own solution.

2 –  Get and Use an Ergonomic Keyboard. 

A good example is the Microsoft Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000.  This will make a HUGE difference in wrist fatigue for many individuals over the long run.  And you can probably make the mental adjustment after as little as one day of use.  The example keyboard is a USB device, so you can plug it into ANY laptop (any made in the last 10 years anyway), as well as any desktop PC or even your MAC.  I know the ergo keyboard choice is a nearly religious topic among computer users, but the objections to trying this are rather weak.

3 – Upgrade Your BorgWare

Borgware?  I’m talking about any artificial stuff that goes onto the outside of your body to help get you through the day.  If you have wrist braces, whether they are the ultra-cheap stretchy bandage, the $20 Ace specials from Rite-Aid, or the megabucks models from your local orthopedic clinic, check that yours are the best for your type of ailment, that you are using them correctly, and that they are in good shape (they can wear out).  I use an off-the-shelf brace from the Ace “Tek Zone” line, found at my local Rite-Aid or Walgreens for about $18, and it works wonders on my wrist. You may have special needs here and advice or prescriptions from your doctor or physical therapist.  If what they provide does not work, get them to fix it or set up you to get another.  If at all possible, find a way to make your insurance pay for it, because that is what it is there for.

4 - Try Voice Recogntion

Voice recognition software has come a long way.  There is the “free” variety that comes built-in with the last couple of Microsoft Windows releases.  I specifically recommend Dragon Naturally Speaking.  The “entry level” Dragon version 10 software can be found for as low as $100 as a boxed set that includes a suitable microphone/headset.  This technology has really matured.  You can reasonably expect to achieve better than 96% percent accuracy after just a couple of hours of “training” (reading canned paragraphs) and use.  You can use this to put text directly into your word processor program.  I have used it with MS Word (from ’97 to 2007 versions),  OpenOffice Writer, Celtx, even “VI for Windows” (yeah, for some things VI still rules).  And you can usually use it to “drive” the computer, i.e. to launch other programs and switch between them, though that is a bit more complicated.  The higher end versions add still more functionality.  This solution is not for everyone, but if you are psychologically flexible enough to get over the initial weirdness, you will find this can be an awesome tool.  You can even use it to feed your dictations, i.e. to play your tape recordings to your computer and have it transcribe them for you.

 4 – Do an Ergo Check on Your Workspace

Your desk, keyboard height, monitor height, chair height and tilt, etc., all interact to form your total ergonomic environment.  If the wrists are the Sore Spot, you can start with chair and keyboard heights, wrist angle to keyboard, and work out from there. A lot of this you can determine from on-line research.  But you may also be able to tap into your medical insurance to get professional advice, even an on-site (at home or work) ergo assessment by a suitable professional.  If your insurance won’t cover it, you may be able to contract an ergonomics pro to consult with you at a less-than-doctor-visit rate, perhaps even via email by sending them some critical measurements of your workspace.  There are also local classes in ergonomic office setup available at some local college campuses.

 5 – Explore Dietary Influences

In other words, consider saying goodbye to the cow, or at least the solid parts of her in your refrigerator.  When my joint problems in my wrists and elsewhere were at their worst, I was advised by a friend to try reducing my red meat intake.  As a major consumer of hamburger and steak, this was quite an adjustment for me, but I did try it.  The results after a couple of weeks without beef were simply astounding.  I still eat the occasional t-bone or hamburger, but as a treat, not a regular meal.  I have replaced about 85-90% of my previous beef consumption with chicken or fish, and it has made a huge difference.

 I am no professional ergonomic specialist, dietition, or orthopedic expert … I am just a professional person who uses his computer to make a living, and who has had to make “adjustments” to keep working at times.  Your mileage may vary.  Anything that represents a substantial change in your personal habits should be sanity-checked by someone with training and experience.  If you are on a budget or one of the Uninsured Masses (I have been there), there are still cheap and free solutions you can pursue.  It is your environment.  Own it!

Posted in Writing Tools | 2 Comments

Technique – Delaying your Outlook email transmissions

In a previous post, I mention my problem with “premature transmission” of an email, sending a message to a group other than the intended party, and some reasons how I allowed myself to slip up this way.

A friend has since pointed me to a methodology to prevent at least some cases of this.  The technique is to set up a special rule to delay outgoing messages.  In the case of my big Oops, I knew right after I had pressed send what I had done.  Even a 30 second delay would have saved me and others from embarrassment.  The technique this friend shared (thanks, Tammy) is a CNET tip.  Check it out here:  http://news.cnet.com/8301-13880_3-9929823-68.html

Again, this only works if you are using Outlook as your email manager.  I am not sure of other mail programs (Thunderbird, etc.) have a similar feature, but it would be nice of they did.  I followed the example of the article’s author, Dennis O’Reilly, and set up a rule that holds messages for three minutes before sending.  It has an exception for High Importance messages, which are still sent out immediately.   It took only a minute to set up the rule and another minute to test it.  It may not be the most powerful tool ever, but if it saves you from grief even once, it’s worth it.

- D

Posted in Communication, Writing Tools | 4 Comments

Bad tools? More like Bad Habits.

There is an old adage: ”A good craftsman never blames his tools for defects in worksmanship.”

If we were to update that adage, would we say craftsperson?  Would we include Microsoft Windows or Microsoft Office on the list of allowable tool exceptions, just to be fair? 

Perhaps.

Yesterday I made a significant blunder by sharing an email containing mildly sensitive personal information  with a group of people, including the people mentioned in the message among the sendees.  I had intended to send this email to just one person.  Fortunately, the bulk of the message also included sincere statements about my appreciation for this group of people.  But it was still a blunder, colossal on a local level.  I finally figured out how the blunder occurred, and what my (not so) trusty Microsoft Office tool suite had done to contribute to the pilot error I induced while driving Outlook 2007.

The minor detail that tripped me up?  The title bars for specific windows of Office 2007 do not change color when they are selected.  This applies to both the primary Outlook interface and individual windows for emails I am reading or in the process of writing.  So while I thought I was typing and pressing the ENTER key in one window (while also talking on the phone), I was actually in a different window.  I had typed the name of a distrution list into the “To:” field of an open email window … pressing the ENTER key sent it out to the world.

Did Outlook 2007′s email draft window failure to show itself as “highlighted” contribute to my blunder?  Yes.  Is it Outlook 2007′s fault this happened?  Of course not. 

Here are five stupid things I did leading up to this:

  • Talking on the phone while doing email – this is never a good idea.  It is not quite as dumb as texting while driving, but there is danger there.
  • Running 20+ windows at the same time (browsers, emails, in-process MS word reviews, in-process MS word creations, etc.), instead of focusing on a reasonably small (i.e. managable) number of tasks and programs (like 2 or 3)
  • Not bothering to closely check where the text I was typing was actually showing up.
  • Running the new (to me) Office 2007 for days and not exploring why the title bar not-highlighting problem existed (only for Office 2007) and what to do to fix it.

Last, but certainly not least:

  • I wrote something with content that made me and others squirm when it “got out” to people not on the intended addressee list.

This last one is a hard pill to swallow, at least for me, because it made me realise that there is a significant quantity of electronic correspondence I conduct that would not necessarily reflect well on me should it one day appear in the D. E. Helbling Memorial Library.  I am sure I am not terribly unique in this respect.  But does that make it OK? 

This incident has made me re-examine my approach to email (and IM’s and FaceBook and related media).  Should I really write anything that would cause me or others embarrassment if they were to read it?  Given the realities of modern electronic security, there are no assurances my correspondence will remain private.  And even if it did, there is the moral implication of writing things that make people uncomfortable.  

Of course, part of the nature of writing is such that we are sometimes called to write about truths that others wish would remain hidden.  The key here is to be fair, accurate, and loyal to those who trust us to not betray confidences.  I am determined to do a better job on all of these fronts going forward.

Fortunately for me, it appears that the bulk of affected parties from my Big Blunder of the Week bear no hard feelings.  But I will dance more carefully between screens in the future. 

- D

Posted in Communication, Writing Tools | Leave a comment

Yet Another Communications Channel

This is a blog test.  It is only a blog test.  Had this been an actual blog, this might still be as boring.

Posted in Writing As Art | 1 Comment